A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud at the Jeonju District Court on December 16, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on December 16, 201. On March 21, 2013, the Jeonju District Court sentenced one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2013.

1. Crimes committed in “C”;

A. At around 16:00 on September 4, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) indicated the “E” in the respective customer signature column in Chapter 2 of the “C” agency located in Y in Yansan-gu, Jeoncheon-gu; and (b) signed the “E” in each resident registration number column by stating the “E” in the official signature column of Chapter 2 of the “E”, “F 101 Incheon Metropolitan City F. 303” and “E” in each address column; and (c) signed the “E” in each resident registration number column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged two copies of the mobile phone application in the name of E, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document

At the time and place stated in the paragraph, C business owners, who knew of the forgery, exercised two copies of the forged mobile phone new application as if they were duly formed.

C. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document above

At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), I presented the E's resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is an official document in possession of a person who is requested to present his/her identification card, as if the defendant was a resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, the Defendant denied official documents. D.

The Defendant was guilty.

At the time, at the same time and place as mentioned in the paragraph, two copies of the forged mobile phone new application and the resident registration certificates of E were presented, and the victim I deceivings the victim I as if he/she had a legitimate right to engage in the act as he/she was E and purchase the mobile phone under

On September 5, 2012, the Defendant, from the victim, was able to gallon three mobile phones owned by the victim (total market price of KRW 1980,00).