Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 10, 2015, the Defendants, who interfered with their duties, performed alcohol together with F at the main point of “E” in the operation of the victim D, which is located in Busan YY C and the second floor on the part of Busan YY on December 10, 2015, Defendant A, while drinking together with F, Defendant B, Defendant B, and Defendant B, who followed the tables, spawned, spawn, spawn, spawn, etc., spawn for about 10 minutes, spawn the victim’s main business.

2. On December 10, 2015, at around 23:30, the Defendants who interfere with the performance of official duties were sent to the police station at the above location after receiving 112 reports, and confirmed the situation of damage, and then tried to arrest Defendant A as a current offender. Defendant A, in the body of body of the police officer, takes the above police officer’s desire to take the body, and attempted to take the body of the police officer, and attempted to take the body of the police officer, and Defendant B was hick up with the above police officer, and Defendant B took a bath, b was pushed up while carrying the body, and F was blicked with G.

Accordingly, in collusion with F, the Defendants interfered with the execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders, criminal investigation, and 112 reported mobilization of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. The sentencing period of Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act, Article 1 of the Reasons for the Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (Interference with Business Affairs) [the scope of recommending punishment], Article 1 of the Reasons for the Sentencing (Interference with Business Affairs], and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and Article 2 of the Act that has no person who is subject to special sentencing [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of recommended punishment], the basic area (6 months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing] of the basic area (the scope of recommended punishment] (6 months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing], and the scope of the final sentence pursuant to the aggravation of multiple crimes: June to two years [the sentence], the Defendants committed a disturbance at their main points, thereby obstructing business operations, and police officers dispatched after receiving a report.