Changwon District Court-2015-B-30958 ( August 11, 2015)

Since the fact of the instant transaction was reported to the competent tax office at that time, whether the Plaintiff was aware that the instant sales contract constituted a fraudulent act at that time.

It is presumed that the non-party delinquent debtor, who was in excess of debt, entered into a sales contract on the real estate of this case, which is the only real estate between the defendant and his own partner, constitutes a fraudulent act that causes the lack of joint security of other creditors, including the plaintiff, and constitutes a creditor's fraudulent act that causes damage to the plaintiff, and the defendant's bad faith is presumed to be a

Supreme Court Decision 2013Da5855 Decided April 26, 2013

2015Da235940 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

AA

Korea

Changwon District Court Decision 2015Na30958 Decided August 11, 2015

December 24, 2015

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant is not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent