1. The Defendant’s KRW 2 million and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from December 8, 2010 to August 24, 2016, and the following.

Basic Facts

On December 7, 2010, the Plaintiff visited the “C value Department” operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant deemed that the Plaintiff had an impediment to the unity, and, on the other hand, performed the procedure to reduce the 3 Daegu value on the upper left and right right side of the Plaintiff.

On December 8, 2010, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s dental license to perform the same procedure. The Defendant, on the other hand, visited the Plaintiff’s dental license to reduce the 2 Daegu on the Plaintiff’s upper left left and right right (hereinafter “instant consular license”).

[Based on the ground of recognition, the Plaintiff asserted the purport of the entire argument on December 7, 2010, upon the Defendant’s recommendation, as a result of the Plaintiff’s request for physical examination of the head of the Giman University’s Hhodong Hospital affiliated with the Giman University. The Plaintiff was undergoing the instant intersection coordination procedure on December 7, 2010, and re-undercing the Defendant to the end of the next day. The Defendant did not explain the side effects, etc. before the instant intersection coordination procedure. The Defendant did not exercise any general duty of care while performing the instant intersection coordination procedure. In short, the Plaintiff caused the Plaintiff’s symptoms to the Plaintiff at the wind, which had excessively cut 5 of the Plaintiff’s dental children, and eventually caused the Plaintiff’s symptoms to the Plaintiff.

As a result, the Plaintiff suffered damages of KRW 4,224,00 per day-time income, KRW 4,211,790 per day-time medical treatment expenses, KRW 13,015,00 per day-time medical treatment expenses, KRW 50 million per day-time medical treatment expenses, and KRW 50,000 per day-time medical treatment expenses, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff.

When a doctor of the legal doctrine on the assertion of medical malpractice in the occurrence of liability for damages provides medical services such as diagnosis and treatment, he/she has the duty of care to take the best measures required to prevent risks depending on the patient's specific symptoms or circumstances in light of the nature of the duties of managing human life, body, and health. The doctor's said duty of care at the time of performing medical