logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.17 2012가합509584
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s medical treatment conducted against the Defendant after November 6, 2007, etc. based on the medical treatment conducted by the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a doctor who operates D Council Members (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”) on the third floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The defendant is a patient who received correction treatment from November 6, 2007 to the plaintiff.

B. On November 6, 2007, the Defendant continued to provide corrective treatment, such as the Plaintiff’s care at the Plaintiff’s hospital and the Plaintiff’s care at the hospital, and the Plaintiff’s care began after consultation on the symptoms, such as the Plaintiff’s satisfying to the right side and sound. 2) On December 28, 2007, the Plaintiff continued to provide the Defendant with corrective treatment, such as the discovery of the custody of bad on the right right side of December 28, 2007, 2008, 2009, screen dust, etc. around 2009, and 300,000,000,000.

C. On May 23, 2011, the Defendant: (a) was diagnosed on May 23, 201 to be out of the bones, and thus was diagnosed as unable to contain the life expectancy; (b) copied his medical record.

On February 16, 2012, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to compensate for damages on the ground that there was a fluoral reduction, fluoral certificate, fluoral absorption, fluoral fluorum, fluoral fluorum, and fluoral fluoral fluorum.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence (including each number), and the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff fulfilled his best duty of care in the medical treatment against the defendant, and the defendant's assertion is due to the defendant's non-compliance of the medical treatment period.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's injury was inflicted on the defendant because the plaintiff failed to fulfill his duty of care, such as collecting only self-satison correction even in the defendant's suffering lake

(b) When a doctor provides medical services, such as diagnosis and treatment, considering the nature of the service of managing human life, body, and health;

arrow