Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assaulting is acquitted. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecution is instituted.

The acquittal portion

1. Around 16:00 on December 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stopped while driving a D1 ton cargo vehicle in front of the C reconstruction site located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) took a bath for security guards at the construction site of the said construction site on the ground that the surface was left behind; (c) the Defendant, the head of the said construction site, was the victim E (62 aged) who was the head of the said construction site, was the head of the said vehicle; and (d) the Defendant did not want to talk with the victim that he was seated in the said truck driver’s seat of the said cargo vehicle.

“The Defendant continued to start this part of the cargo vehicle, which is a dangerous object, even though the Defendant was seated immediately next to the driver’s seat of the above cargo vehicle while the driver’s seat of the above cargo vehicle was opened, and the left part of the victim’s left part of the cargo vehicle was left front of the left side of the above cargo vehicle and got the victim go beyond the floor, thereby making the victim go beyond the floor, the Defendant set a part of the victim’s left part of the cargo vehicle that needs to be treated for about two weeks.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous cargo vehicles, which are dangerous goods, and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel had no intention to injure the defendant at the time of the instant case.

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the defendant strongly resisted the state of the road surface at the construction site and left the construction site, and the defective victim suspended the vehicle of the defendant, and opened the driver's seat and opened the driver's seat door and the driver's seat, and continued to leave the road at the construction site of this case for a considerable period of time.

The victim, however, was asked to not move until the police is called, and the progress of the vehicle was prevented, and the defendant is open to leave the scene.