The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, Defendant 1 did not commit an assault by breaking the victim D with the front part of the vehicle by driving the Poter truck, or by breaking the victim E with the front part of the vehicle. The Defendant 1 did not injure the victim E with the front part.

B. Sentencing

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant committed an assault that the defendant operated a Poter freight vehicle, which is a dangerous object, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, and caused the above victim E to go in excess of the victim D, with the front qui of the above vehicle driver's seat, and caused the above victim to face the left side of the victim E with approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

full recognition may be accepted.

This part of the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

1) After selling land to the victim E, the Defendant has been in dispute with the victims as a problem of access road boundary.

At the time of the crime of this case, the Defendant, as a matter of the use of access roads with the victims, was in a state where the appraisal has been sleeped and became worse.

2) The Defendant filed 112 reports on the victim D’s provoking of his paint in the course of a dispute, and had been trying to drive the cargo while driving the cargo onto the police station. The victim D prevented the front of the above vehicle, and the victim E made a protest against the Defendant attached to the driver’s seat.

3) The victim D consistently went beyond the front part of the vehicle from the investigative agency to the court of the court below.

The victim E also stated that, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the defendant consistently left the wheels of the cargo vehicle, and that the victim E had the front wheels due to the movement of the vehicle after the defendant left the front.

was stated.