logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.08.29 2014고정526
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:10 on February 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was driving a C Poter Cargo, and was moving to the right-hand part of the G Poter’s “E” restaurant “E” restaurant “E” restaurant “E” located in Seopo-si; (b) neglected his duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear and operate it on the right-hand side of the vehicle; and (c) neglected his duty of care to prevent the collision; and (d) neglected his duty of care to prevent the collision; (c) obstructed the central line by driving it on the right-hand side of the vehicle owned by the Defendant; and (d) caused the Defendant’s failure to perform his duty of care to operate it safely; and (d) led the Defendant’s failure to perform his duty of care to drive it on the right-hand side of the vehicle owned by H Ha, and (e) led the Defendant’s collision in the front part of the vehicle owned by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F, such as fat, tensions, and tensions that require treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the above taxi, fat and fat bat bat bats, and escaped from the site without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, while destroying the bat bat bats.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness F;

1. Literacy statements;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel (i) of the actual condition survey report, saw, six copies of the site photograph, and the medical certificate

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant and his defense counsel cannot be deemed to have necessary to take relief measures against the victim given the victim’s statement about the degree of injury, and even if the Defendant left the scene without notifying the victim of contact information, the Defendant and his defense counsel could have known the Defendant’s personal information by speaking the location and name of the victim.

arrow