Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu31453 Decided April 6, 2012

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du3038 ( December 02, 2010)

(C) It is difficult to see that the loan contract constitutes the most serious act as a conspiracy with others who are inconsistent with the truth and indication.

(C) In light of the above legal principles, it is difficult to deem that the above loan contract constitutes an act of misrepresentation as a false representation, since it is difficult to deem that the above loan contract constitutes an act of misrepresentation as a false representation, since it is difficult to deem that the above loan contract constitutes an act of misrepresentation as a false representation, since it is difficult to deem

2012du9550 Revocation of revocation of revocation of reduction or rectification of corporate tax

XX Co., Ltd

Head of Yeongdeungpo Tax Office

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu31453 Decided April 6, 2012

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final