beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 14, 2009, the Committee for the Inspection of Damage from Force Mobilization and the Support of Victims, etc. of Force Mobilization in the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Committee”), which is a telegraphicul of the Committee for the Support of Victims, etc. of Force Mobilization in Japan (hereinafter “the Committee”), decided on October 22, 2010 to “victim B” under Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Special Act on the Inspection of the Truth of Force Mobilization Damage by Force Mobilization in South-do, South-do, to confirm the fact that he/she was mobilized as a worker at a work site in South-do from October 1942 to April 1944, 194, and forced him/her to be mobilized as a “victim” under Article 2 subparag. 2 of the former Act on the Inspection of the Truth of Force Mobilization Damage by Force Mobilization in Japan (hereinafter “the Act”).
B. On May 26, 2014, six bereaved family members of the deceased, including the plaintiff (hereinafter "the plaintiff, etc.") filed an application for consolation money with the committee established under the Special Act on the Support for Force Mobilization Investigation and Mobilization Victims, etc. of the Japanese War (hereinafter "Compulsory Mobilization Investigation Act"). On June 25, 2015, the committee of this case acknowledged that on June 25, 2015, the deceased et al. suffered pictures by forced mobilization of the deceased as labor workers in the US workplace located in Yangyang-do from October 1942 to April 194, Article 2 of the Compulsory Mobilization Investigation Act, Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the deceased's physical disability grade No. 12 subparag. 13 of the same Act (hereinafter "the Commission decided to pay consolation money of KRW 300,000, and KRW 300 (hereinafter "the case").
C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant decision and filed a petition for review on September 3, 2015. However, the instant commission dismissed it on December 17, 2015, and the Plaintiff et al. received the said consolation money equally divided by KRW 500,000.
Meanwhile, pursuant to the proviso of Article 19(1) of the Compulsory Mobilization Investigation Act, the term of existence of the instant committee expired on December 31, 2015, and the Defendant’s affairs under its jurisdiction pursuant to Article 19(4) of the same Act.