logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.05.03 2016고합29
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around 2012, the Defendant, who obstructed the business of the victim C, had a usual complaint against the failure to receive the reasonable death and medical expenses from the victim, even though he/she had been injured by the victim C.

A. On March 3, 2016, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at the 20:00 square districts, found the Defendant as “E” restaurant with the operation of the victim in Busan Southern-gu, Busan-gu.

The defendant is suffering from the victim's "Chewing flasium, flasium, flasium, and even flasium flasium."

In order to prevent customers from entering a restaurant for about 30 minutes, such as putting a bath, etc., they interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

B. On March 5, 2016, at around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) took the bath of “E” restaurant for the foregoing reasons; (b) repeated the occurrence of it; (c) demanded the victim to lend cash only KRW 10,000 to the victim; and (d) demanded the victim to sound the victim to “no longer need to do so; hereinafter, the Defendant does not have to enter the restaurant for about one hour, such as tearing down the waste; and (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by preventing customers who enter the restaurant, who were in charge of smoking, from entering the restaurant.”

(c)

On March 6, 2016, the Defendant, at around 16:19, stated that “E” restaurant for the foregoing reasons, read “E”, she hanged the time, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by allowing customers, who were visiting the restaurant, to enter the restaurant, such as leaving the part of F, which visited the restaurant to deliver the restaurant at the time of the Scam-distance with the entrance of the restaurant, and leaving the restaurant once on the hand, etc., in order to prevent them from entering the restaurant.

2. The Defendant interferes with the business of the victim G on March 13, 2016.

arrow