(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.07.12 2016고단403

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.07.12 2016고단403

특수협박등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Special intimidation Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on March 4, 2016, within the “E” operated by the Victim D (V, 52 years of age) located in Won-si, Seoul, the Defendant drinks four alcohols with four alcohols.

Although the victim said to the effect that it is the victim's pathy, the victim's pathy pathy pathy was the victim's pathy, and the victim broken the beer's pathy with the beer's disease on the table table in order to let the victim frighten, and then put the victim into his hand "defincation of this year" and "defincation of this year," and put the victim into intimidation, and put the victim into intimidation by continuously taking the head debt of the victim.

(A) The Defendant asserts that there was no fact of breaking the disease at the time of the instant case, but there was no fact of putting the head of the victim’s hair and intimidation.

However, in this Court, the injured party was subject to the defendant's fluoration of head and intimidation.

When considering the fact that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant, there is no reason to make a false statement unfavorable to the defendant. At the time of the instant case, considering the fact that the defendant was satisfing the victim and satisfing himself/herself with the victim's disease, the victim's statement has credibility in the victim's statement. Thus, there is a fact that the defendant threatened the victim

The decision is judged.

Therefore, this part of the claim is not accepted)

2. The Defendant, upon receipt of a report at the same time and place as paragraph 1, received a request for identification card from the victim G security guards belonging to the police branch of the original police station F District, and received a request for the identification card from the police officer belonging to the police branch of the original police station, and the owner of the business at the place. “Is the voice of the police officer is greater;

C. The victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly fluoring flusium, “A flusium flusium flusium”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and D;

1. The statement of the police with regard to G.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2017.06.08 2017고합13

-서울서부지방법원 2021.04.14 2020고단3792

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.06.24 2016고단1211

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2021.01.27 2020고단1162

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.15 2016고단700