Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2015, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as interference with business, and interference with property damage, from the E 23th E in Gangwon-gu around 22:40, on the ground that he lost money in a casino, making it difficult to avoid disturbance on the ground that he/she lost money in a casino, she was breading, she laid the sick disease on the entrance, dump, and dump at the entrance, and dump in which he/she laid on the floor.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the entrance door door windows equivalent to KRW 3,10,000 at the market price owned by the victim Gangseoland and interfered with the business of the victim by force.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant was at the time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and the Defendant was asked from H of the G police box affiliated with the G police box dispatched by the Defendant upon receiving a report of the disturbance as above, and was at the time and place, and at the bottom of the hand, at the left face of H one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reported duties, and at the same time, the Defendant damaged the public nature of the audience play in need of medical treatment for about one week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and H;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTVs, written estimates, on-site photographs, diagnostic certificates, and CCTV images;

1. Articles 314 (1), 366, 136 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (including the absence of any previous conviction since 2000 and the early agreement between the victims and the victims);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;