A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2015, the Defendant was investigated into the suspicion of violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act at the city house and office of Pyeongtaek-gun Office Office in order to not discover the occurrence of a fine, and the Defendant was asked to produce an identification card by a special judicial police officer C while carrying out the act as if the Defendant was a birth, and the Defendant was asked to present an identification card by the special judicial police officer C, and the Defendant’s driver’s license of the above B, a person’s official document held by the Defendant, was presented to the said C as the Defendant’s identification witness.

2. The Defendant: (a) was investigated on the charge of violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act at the above date, time, and at the above place; and (b) was committed as if the Defendant was her living together with B; (c) forged another’s signature by entering the “B” in the column of the statement of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority to be exercised as if the Defendant was her living together; and (d) the special judicial police officer, who was aware of the forgery, forged the protocol of interrogation containing the forged signature, and exercised another’s signature by putting the forged signature on the same page as if the signature duly formed was written.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol concerning B (including a copy of the resident registration certificate attached B) to the police interrogation protocol;

1. Articles 230 and 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The background leading up to the crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the crime of this case was committed in order not to arrest a person designated as a fine) shall be considered as unfavorable circumstances, but the time limit and reflectability shall be considered as favorable circumstances.

In this regard, all of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment.