1. Attached Form 1, which the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on April 10, 2019, does not allow the Plaintiff to peruse and copy the information listed in the attached Table 1.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 27, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages against B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) that had previously worked before the Plaintiff (Seoul Central District Court 2016Gahap57369) (Seoul Central District Court 2016Gahap57369). As the price of common shares B in the said civil lawsuit became a major issue, C, who was a employee of B, was present and testified as a witness in the court on January 25, 2018.

B. On February 6, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that C’s above testimony was false statements, and filed a complaint with C at the Gyeonggi Branch Police Station. On February 28, 2018, the Gyeonggi Branch Police Station was suspected of having been sent to C on February 28, 2018 (Evidence of Evidence).

On March 27, 2018, the Sung-nam Branch Office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office issued a disposition of non-prosecution on the charge of committing the offense against C on March 27, 2018.

(No. 7573).

Since then, the plaintiff appealed against the above disposition of non-prosecution by the Sung-nam District Prosecutors' Office, but the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office dismissed the plaintiff's appeal on April 27, 2018.

(2018 High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for adjudication on July 20, 2018 (Seoul High Court 2018 High Court 2019), and the Plaintiff re-appealed against it on October 25, 2018, but the Supreme Court dismissed the reappeal on October 25, 2018.

(2018Mo2418) d.

On April 9, 2019, the Plaintiff applied for the perusal and copying of the “fact-finding” on the entire records of the cases in the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office 2018-type 7573, the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office 2018-type 7573, the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office 2018-type 4358, the Seoul High Court 2018-type 2299, and the Supreme Court 2018-type 2418.

On April 10, 2019, the Defendant shall permit the Plaintiff’s statement documents and the Plaintiff’s documents to be submitted to the Plaintiff, and, except for this, shall keep the information recorded in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant information”) confidential due to the disclosure of the records under Article 22(1)4 of the Rules on the Preservation of Prosecution (hereinafter “instant Rules”).