1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 281,00,000 and the period from June 28, 2018 to November 13, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff paid money to Defendant B, respectively, transferred KRW 160 million to Defendant B’s account on February 20, 2014, KRW 60 million, KRW 60 million on July 1, 2014, and KRW 74 million on July 7, 2014.

B. Defendant B, from January 11, 2018, operated the instant funeral hall, Defendant B, a spouse of Defendant B, was registered as the business entity of the instant funeral hall. The Defendant C, a spouse of Defendant B, is registered as the business entity of the instant funeral hall.

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendants to the effect that “the Defendants did not have any intention to work together with the Plaintiff from the beginning, and did not have any intent or ability to repay the said money even after receiving the money from the Plaintiff. Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with the Plaintiff on January 2014 to suggest that Defendant B would run a funeral home business together with the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff received a total of KRW 294 million from February 20, 2014 to July 7, 2014 from the Plaintiff, and acquired it by transfer from the Plaintiff to Defendant B’s national bank account (YU District District Prosecutors’ Office in the Republic of Korea, No. 2018No. 1450) (No. 2), the branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office in the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office in the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office in November 13, 2018, on the ground that there was no objective evidence proving the facts charged other than the Plaintiff’s statement, and that there was no evidence to prove the Plaintiff’s criminal charges (No evidence).

3) The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication with Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court 2019 early 928), but the Seoul High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for adjudication on May 1, 2109. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s 1, 3, and 4, and Eul’s 1, 3, and 4, respectively (including a serial number if any); the same applies hereinafter.

- The purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. Plaintiff 1) The Plaintiff’s primary claim is Defendant B’s totaling KRW 294 million against the Defendant B.