1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant educational foundation D University is a juristic person operating the D University Hospital located in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul. Defendant B and C are doctors working at the above D University Hospital, Defendant E is a doctor working at the F Medical Center I Hospital located in Ansan-si (hereinafter “I Hospital”), and Defendant F Medical Center is Defendant E’s employer.

B. On May 20, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to an internal test by Defendant E, and Defendant E removed some of the organizations of the said parts of the said track and requested the NAD medical institute to conduct an organizational test.

다. 피고 E은 2013. 5. 24. 네오딘의학연구소로부터 ‘suggestive of well diff. adenocarcinoma‘라는 진단결과를 통보받고, 이에 따라 원고에게 위암 소견이 있음을 알리면서 더 큰 규모의 병원에 가서 정밀진단을 받으라고 권유하였다. 라.

Since then, the plaintiff was subject to the organization inspection at the Seoul Asan Hospital, but was judged not to be the Masan. On June 5, 2013, the plaintiff sent the results of the above inspection to defendant E at the Seoul Asan Hospital.

마. 피고 E은 2013. 6. 5. 원고에게 다시 대학 병원에서 확인받을 것을 권유하면서 “상기 환자는 본원에서 검진 내시경 등 시행하여 위궤양의 소견이 있어서 조직검사를 시행하였고, 결과 suggestive of well diff. adenocarcinoma의 소견으로 판명되어 정밀진단과 치료 위해 전원한다”는 내용의 진료의뢰서를 작성하여 원고를 D대학교병원으로 전원 의뢰하였다.

F. On June 10, 2013, the Plaintiff submitted to the D University Hospital a report on the results of the examination of the relevant city and the organization conducted by the I Hospital; Defendant E’s written request for medical treatment; Defendant B, a medical specialist outside the D University Hospital, confirmed tracedic disease that may be suspected of the traculation in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the ethical ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic