A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2015 Highest 1734" is a person who has no fixed occupation.

1. On February 5, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C by telephone, stating that “If a branch is making a lot of money due to the construction of a factory in China, 50 million won will be repaid ten days after lending it.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not use it as the expense for the construction of the Chinese factory, but was thought to use it as the personal debt, and there was no intention or ability to pay it ten days later.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 40 million won from the victim to the post office account under the name of the Defendant for the purpose of borrowing money from the victim.

2. On July 4, 2014, the Defendant, in the Franchisium of the victim E operation in Jeju Island, handled the victim’s “a day on which he/she himself/herself handles the good, so he/she has a day to handle it personally in Busan,” and returned to the victim within one week.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant received a advance payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to work at the above business establishment.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 10 million won from the victim to the post office account under the name of the Defendant under the pretext of advance payment from the victim.

3. On March 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00, at H’s station located in G in Dong Young-si; (b) “A victim I, an owner of his/her business, works in Jeju-do at his/her place of business, and (c) is a 3.8 million won of his/her debt owed to Jeju-do.

And I may engage in the same work as two A.C.

4 million won in case of an advance payment of 4 million won

3. From 10. to H, work at H's main point.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant received a advance payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to work at the above business establishment.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is a post office under the name of the defendant as an advance payment from the victim.