logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.05.11 2017고정196
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 High 196" did not intend to work as an employee of the said danran bar even if he/she receives a good good money from the victim D on April 14, 2016, operated by the victim D in Seopo-si C.

Nevertheless, the defendant will work for the victim as an employee of the above dan dan 3,000,000 won in good faith.

In other words, it received 8 million won from the damaged person to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in his own name, and acquired it by fraud.

"2017 High 197"

1. On April 9, 2016, the Defendant found the victim H in Jeju Island at the victim H in G, thereby falsely stating that “The Defendant would work as a face-to-face employee with the victim’s day-to-day payment KRW 5 million.”

However, in fact, the defendant could not work on a bridge, and other main points will also work.

And even if the victim received the advance payment from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to work as an employee from the main point of the victim's operation.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and, in other words, he acquired 5 million won from the victim to the J's account.

2. On April 12, 2016, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would work as an employee for a period of five months from the main point operated by the Party, the Party, the Party, the Party, and the Party, the Party, who was in the Dong Hong-dong, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.” to the Victim K.

However, in fact, the defendant could not work on a bridge, and other main points will also work.

And even if the victim received the advance payment from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to work as an employee from the main point of the victim's operation.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 7.93 million won from the victim to the agricultural bank account under the name of the defendant, i.e., the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High Doz. 196"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A certificate of the results of electronic financial transfer, a certificate of borrowing;

arrow