logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2015.07.28 2014가단50397
위자료
Text

Defendant B’s KRW 10,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from December 20, 2014 to July 28, 2015.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

From January 2006, Defendant B had her tiesd with the Plaintiff and her friended with the Plaintiff. Around December 2006, Defendant B was pregnant with Defendant C, and the Plaintiff had liveded with the Plaintiff from May 2007 after the restriction on the volume of 3 months, and had a de facto marital relationship.

Defendant B, who was born with E, but refused to report the marriage and the report of birth with the Plaintiff, completed the marriage and the report of birth on December 11, 2007.

On April 8, 2008, the original defendant reported the divorce on April 8, 2008. At the time, the right of custody and the parental authority over D had the defendant B.

On November 12, 2009, the gene analysis report was prepared on December 16, 2009 to presume that the relationship between Defendant C and D is established.

(hereinafter “instant gene identification”). On March 12, 2014, Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff and D seeking confirmation of paternity (No. 2014ddan2085) and rendered a quoted judgment on October 29, 2014, and became final and conclusive around that time.

(hereinafter “Related Cases.” The Plaintiff is the Defendant B’s KRW 7,600 on January 22, 2008, and the same year.

2. 7.6,890 won shall be paid, and after consultation has been married, the amount of KRW 3,000,000 on May 12, 2008, KRW 150,000 on September 26, 2009, and KRW 114,000 on December 17, 200 on each of them was paid.

On August 27, 2014, the Plaintiff was served with a complaint for the relevant case.

[Grounds for recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 7, and 9 (the number of provisional numbers is included; hereinafter the same shall apply), the plaintiff's personal examination result, significant facts in this court, the plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings, and the plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, by deceiving the plaintiff, as if the defendant Eul was pregnant, so that the plaintiff may marry with the defendant Eul.

The Defendants committed unlawful acts during the marriage period of the Plaintiff.

The Defendants had the Plaintiff become aware of D as their own child until the relevant case is filed, and this has been caused.

arrow