The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was working as a safety manager at the site of three construction sections located in the Korea Development Corporation in the following City:

On May 19, 2016, the Defendant, at around 14:40 on May 19, 2016, issued approval to the victim E (36) who is the head of the site office, to purchase safety supplies to be supplied to on-site workers at the office of the site site office.

The Defendant stated that “the victim, who was dissatisfied with the purchase of the volume and the dispute, was able to take the bath,” and that “the victim, who was able to take the bath, she was assaulted by the victim at one time on the left left-hand side of the victim due to a final judgment cited by the Defendant in his/her hand.”

However, as a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution may not be instituted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with paragraph (3) of the same Article.

According to the public trial records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on July 3, 2018, which is after the institution of public prosecution. Thus, the public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.