The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On July 24, 2013, C Co., Ltd. entered into a subcontract with the said Co., Ltd. as a contractor and E as a contractor with respect to the construction work of D Railroad Construction No. 5 Section 5 Section 5 Section 1 Section and structure.

Defendant C’s employees working for the above Section C as safety managers at the construction site of Section 5, while F is the employees of the above Company E, who worked for the said Section 5-1 construction site and the construction site site of Section 5-1 construction site.

On November 4, 2014, the victim I (54), the number of drivers of H, who entered into a contract to lease equipment with E on November 4, 2014, in the above 5-1 Section 5-1 Section G managed by the Defendant and F, was driving a dump truck, which is the number of drivers of H, who entered into a contract to lease equipment with E on November 4, 2014.

In such cases, the defendant and F have a duty of care to place signal numbers to the construction site so that safety accidents may not occur during the operation of vehicles at the construction site, install a margin to prevent after-the-way, and check whether the relevant safety measures are properly implemented at any time to prevent safety accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and F neglected this and failed to properly check the safety measures at the site without installing a signal signal signal, and the Defendant and F caused the instant victim’s dump truck to fall down below the sloping level during the work of leaving the driver’s seat to the upper degree of about 70 degrees, thereby getting the victim to shock the part of the driver’s seat on which the victim boarded.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with F, suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt in need of approximately four weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Determination

A. The occupational negligence referred to in the relevant legal doctrine and the crime of occupational negligence is the occupational negligence.