1. The plaintiff's primary defendant and the conjunctive defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. E, the representative director of the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) which was the primary Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”)’s introduction, is the external lodging of the primary Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

The supplementary intervenor D (hereinafter "the supplementary intervenor") and F (E) are the parents of the supplementary intervenor D, and G (the spouse of the plaintiff) and H are the first, third, E.

B. Money transaction relationship 1) Of the monetary transaction relationship between the Plaintiff (G) and the Defendant Company, the part at issue in this case is referred to as set out below [Attachment 1] (hereinafter referred to as “in sequence 1, etc. according to the sequences set forth in Table 1 below. The following table 1 is referred to as Defendant B’s “Defendant B, Defendant Company,” and Defendant 2 “Defendant 2.”

[Attachment 1] Temporary - Defendant 1 - Defendant 2 - Defendant 2 - Defendant 1 - Defendant 1 - Defendant 2 - Defendant 1 2, 2010-08 - 100,000 (Plaintiffs side - Defendant 1) - Defendant 2, 00-230,000 - Defendant 1, 2010-230,000 : Defendant 2: 00 separate debt 00-16, 000, 00-16, 000, 00-16, 00, 200-7, 00-16, 00-7, 00, 000, 200-7, 00-16, 000, 00-7, 000, 200-7, 000-7, 000-10-7, 007.

G transferred KRW 50 million to H around January 6, 2010.

H around January 8, 2010, around 9:29, remitted to Defendant B KRW 350,000 under his own name.