The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff leased each of the above money to co-defendant B of the first instance trial by transferring the money of the corresponding amount to the account of each payee in the corresponding column on the date and time specified in the table 1 below.

Serial 10,00,00 on November 9, 2017; Defendant 2, 10,000 on December 5, 2017; 40,000 D on December 6, 2017; 20,000 on December 19, 2017; 5,000 on December 10, 20,00 on December 20, 2017; 10,000; 0,000 on December 10, 20,00 on June 10, 208; 10,000 on June 10, 208; 10,000 on March 24, 2018; 10,000 on July 5, 200, 200 on August 18, 2018;

B. B, on March 30, 2018, as indicated in the table 1 to 6, with respect to the money transferred as set forth in the table 2, the creditor prepared three loans with the Plaintiff and the debtor as set out in the table 2, and delivered to the Plaintiff.

No statement No. 1, 30,000,000 of the loan as of November 30, 2017, the principal due date and time of borrowing No. 2, 2017, appears to have been written in writing on December 5, 2017, 30,000 on December 7, 2017.

10,000,000 from the date of borrowing two weeks from the date of December 19, 2017 to the date of borrowing 10,000,000,000, the third increase in the repayment of principal after the lapse of five months from the date of borrowing 5,00,000,000 on December 20, 2017

C. The Defendant and B are married couple.

B is the actual operator of F Co., Ltd. F (trade name after the change: J. F. hereinafter referred to as “F.”), the defendant was appointed as the representative director of F on March 12, 2018, and resigned on March 28, 2019, and is currently in office as F’s auditor on July 11, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. From November 9, 2017 to August 6, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff lent KRW 232,050,000 to the Defendant and the Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial for the purpose of operating F, and received KRW 5,100,000 among them.

Therefore, the defendant is against the above B.