Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) provided nine rooms, beds, shower rooms, etc. at the “C restingel” located on the first floor of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul. The Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 60,00 in return for commercial sex acts from those who have found the above business place, and by allowing the Defendant to have sexual intercourse with the female employees employed by the Defendant.

2. No one shall advertise any business establishment that performs commercial sex acts, arrangement of commercial sex acts, etc.;

Nevertheless, the defendant posted an advertisement containing information such as business name, telephone number, business hours, and price on the Internet site "D", at the time, place, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) above, and advertised the above business place where sexual traffic is conducted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of E or F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the internal photographing photographs of business places and advertising details of Internet business places;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 20 (1) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have been operated through the Internet advertisement with a large ripple power, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime of this case, and the period of business and the method of business, profit acquired by the defendant seems not to be significant, and the defendant is subject to criminal punishment of a fine of KRW 3 million due to the crime of injury in 2006.