logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.17 2018누65011
부당징계구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts and the part concerning which the plaintiff emphasized at the court of first instance or claimed an additional claim, and thus, citing this in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) In addition, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was not significantly different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and all of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial and the first instance trial were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part written after dismissal] In the third part of the judgment of the first instance, the “technical member of the court of first instance who finds a shower 1” in the fourth part of the 3th part of the judgment of the court of first instance as the “technical member of the court of second instance” and the “technical member of the court of first instance who finds a shower 1” as the “

In the fourth instance judgment of the first instance court, the following two types of letter boxes (Article 54 (4) shall be referred to as "Article 54 (5)."

In the fourth instance judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “to maintain” is to maintain (Provided, That the date of enforcement, November 21, 2016, and the period of suspension from office was changed from November 21 to January 30, 2017).

From the 8th of the judgment of the first instance, the phrase “As. 4 through 7, 9 through 11” of the 9th judgment is as follows: “As. 4, 6, 7, 9 through 11, 38, 42, 44, 45-2 through 15”.

From the 8th of the judgment of the first instance, each of the 8th and 10th and 7th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 196th of the

From the 8th of the first instance judgment, the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel, with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel, with section 54.

The judgment of the court of first instance is rendered.

arrow