logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2016가단16939
약정금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company that has completed the registration of multi-level marketing business in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 11, 201 under the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, Etc., and the Plaintiff is a business operator who has completed the registration of business.

B. For the management of the salespersons, including the Plaintiff, the Defendant classified the position in the order of “DS (HHE) - Mad - Mad - Sphish - Smond - Blomond - Tlomond - Tlomond - Tlomond, according to the sales performance of the salespersons.”

The plaintiff became the class of the Alley class in the above class.

C. As of January 1, 2014, the plan for the compensation of Pakistan prepared by the Defendant was enforced since January 1, 2014 that it applies to the salespersons higher than the dud class among the above positions, and where the salespersons purchase 300,000 PV (sales performance) additional commodities after the dud class achievement, they may enter the compensation plan in the order of 1 code. If the purchase of additional commodities by 300,000 PV again is 30,000,000, it has been operated in the manner of re-entry into the order of 1 to 70,000,000 won, and 1 to 9,000,000,000 won, and 1 to 300,0000,000 won, if the number is completed as follows:

- 이하 아래 그림으로 인한 여백 - ① ↙ ↘ ② ③ ↙ ↘ ↙ ↘ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦

D. From January 2014 to December of the same year, the Plaintiff entered a total of 211 code from the time when the Plaintiff’s business activities were carried out.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without any dispute, Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 3-5, Eul evidence Nos. 6-1 to 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. According to the Defendant’s strike compensation franchise by the Defendant’s primary assertion 1, the Plaintiff’s primary assertion is that “Alley 4 code automatic support is provided at each entry time of Alley 1 code,” and the Plaintiff, a class of Alley, entered the 211 code according to the above calculation method.

Therefore, the above.

arrow