logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.08.31 2017고단1088
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 4. 30. 21:20 경 고흥군 B에 있는 피고인의 집에서 가정 폭력에 관한 112 신고를 받고 출동하여 현장조사를 하는 중에 있던 고흥 경찰서 C 파출소 소속 경찰관인 D의 뒷머리를 손으로 때렸고, 그와 같은 이유로 현행범 체포되어 위 D로부터 순찰 차량에 탈 것을 요구 받자 욕설을 하며 발로 위 D의 낭 심을 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not the same kind of criminal defendant, but the defendant committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties during the suspended execution period. Therefore, the defendant is more responsible.

However, a fine was imposed only once in consideration of the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's family environment in favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the damaged police officer does not want the punishment of the defendant and the defendant does not have the same criminal history.

arrow