The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In relation to the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) 2015 Godan 707, the Defendant did not see the victim D’s reciting, and there is no fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim F.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an injury by putting the victim's back back body, and that the defendant inflicted an injury by taking the victim's back side interest in the victim's damage (the defendant made a false statement with the witness G of the court below's testimony that the victim's witness G was present at the victim's back body D and F's request.

However, the witness G of the court below judged that "the defendant d and pushed each other with the victim D and pushed each other, and hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump was hump because the defendant was hump of the victim D, and this hump was humped by the victim F.

Thus, I thought that he had tried to do so, and stated that he was investigated by the police.

“The fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury as above is merely a statement, and the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury as above is sufficiently recognized by taking full account of the statements of D and F of the witness G of the original instance.

On the other hand, the defendant alleged that the victim F is false even after the diagnosis issued by the victim F. However, there is no reason to believe that the above diagnosis is false. The defendant's argument is without merit.

3. As the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Ma707, Sept. 6, 2015). However, since the “E” of the facts constituting the crime 6 of the High Court Decision 2015Ma707 is a clerical error of “F,” it is obvious