logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고단847
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Height 847] No person shall use or manage any access medium, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts, lend or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute such medium.

Nevertheless, the defendant, on January 16, 2018, tried to reduce the tax from a person who is not the name of the defendant, who is a liquor company, and will give KRW 900,000 per head of the Tong, if the head of the Tong is leased.

“Around January 17, 2018, at the office located in B of the petitioner-gu, Cheongju-si, Kwikset Co., Ltd. used Kwikset’s services to lend one head of Tong, which is an access medium connected to the D bank account (Account Number E) in the name of the defendant.

[2018 Height 1634] No person shall use or manage any access medium, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts, lend or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute such medium.

Nevertheless, on January 17, 2018, the defendant is a private game company, and if the defendant lends the passbook, he will offer three million won per head of Tong.

“On January 18, 2018, in exchange for letters, the Defendant’s H bank account (Account Number I) and physical card in the name of the Defendant at the G office located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and then packages the physical card into the door-to-door gambling, and then send the phone to the K Trustee L in the Daegu-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul.

In this regard, this was replaced.

Accordingly, the defendant promised to receive compensation, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 847]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. A financial transaction information;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV at the point of withdrawal) (2018 high group 1634);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to the N;

1. Data for closures;

1. Investigation Report (in the case of this case, against the nominal holder of the Grand Account in the Meishing Fraud), the Act applies 1.

arrow