Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the performance of duties of railroad workers by intimidation.

Nevertheless, on May 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 11:05 on May 29, 2017, at around D Station customer support room in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) on the half-yearly rate, E would not speak against the Defendant while asking for social workers E (22) (3) who were railroad workers who supported the automatic guidance for selling tickets.

On the face of the defendant, he saw it as "Is without this cover", and saw the shoulder part of E with the left part of the defendant's shoulder and the part of the neck one time with the left part of the defendant's hand, and assaulted the part of E with the left part of the defendant's hand and the part of E one time with the defendant's hand on the left part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning railroad workers' services due to violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (Submission of documents evidencing the evidence of railroad workers of victims E);

1. Application of each photograph, CD-related statute;

1. Article 78 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts, Articles 78 (1) and 49 (2) of the Railroad Safety Act on the Selection of Penalties, and Selection of Fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is against the time when and against the defendant misleads the defendant, there is no record of criminal punishment for about twenty-six years, the defendant has a intellectual disability in class 3, and the health and economic situation are not good (in light of the progress and content of the case, the degree of the defendant's memory against the crime, the investigation and the attitude of the defendant in the trial procedure, etc., the defendant has weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to intellectual disability.

Although it is not visible, it is judged that this disability will be considered in sentencing) and in other trials, such as the age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and degree of assault.