logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.01.27 2015고단1223
철도안전법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates railroad safety Acts shall interfere with the performance of duties of railroad workers due to violence or intimidation;

Nevertheless, on October 29, 2015, the Defendant received from the Korean Railroad Police Officer B (36 tax) dispatched to the site after receiving a report that he/she had a person who operates his/her office and operates his/her office in the office of support for the customers of the third floor of the king-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, 214, and received from the Korean Railroad Officer B (36 tax) who called to the site at around 08:27, 2015, and the Defendant “Nea Police” from the said B;

The sound called "hing, Chewing", and assaulted B's chests twice with a bad hand, such as being pushed in two tights, and being pushed in one face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of railroad workers.

2. The Defendant damaged property, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, received notice from the above B to arrest a criminal who violated the Railroad Safety Act as the current criminal due to the facts constituting the crime described in paragraph 1 from the above B, such as “I am Chewing, Mazk, Mazk kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn k

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property of the Korean Railroad Corporation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to C and B;

1. Investigation report (receiving a report on damaged objects, evidence of railroad workers, and written estimate of damaged objects);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 78(1), 49(2) (the point of obstructing the performance of duties by railroad workers), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow