beta
Text
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 26, 2012, Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) contracted the construction work of installing solar power plants at KRW 108,90,000 for the construction cost, on the roof of the Class II neighborhood living facilities (manufacturing Facilities) No. 198 square meters of the sloping roof of the Goyang-si, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the ownership of E, and the sloping of the general steel structure on the G-ground ground (hereinafter “instant building”).
B. On August 24, 2012, Defendant A subcontracted the supply and installation work of solar structures to Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and the installation work of solar power plants in the above installation work to KRW 90,000,000 for construction cost.
C. Defendant B re-subcontracted to Defendant C (hereinafter only referred to as “C”) of the first instance trial on the same day the co-defendants of the first instance trial, on condition that Defendant B supplied materials, such as solar cell boards, servers, and access teams, in the installation of solar structures, for the assembly of solar structures and the installation of straight lines in the installation of solar structures, KRW 6,900,000 for the construction cost.
C On September 24, 2012, the first instance trial co-defendant D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) ordered the instant building to build a steel bridge for the inspection of solar power plants, and ordered D to work in a state where the fire extinguishers is not installed at all at the work site even though the instant building is accompanied by the melting work.
마. D은 2012. 9. 24. 13:00경 이 사건 건물 지붕 위에서 용접 작업을 하였는데, 용접 작업 과정에서 튄 용접 불꽃으로 인하여 이 사건 건물에서 화재가 발생한 후 이 사건 건물까지 번져 이 사건 건물 및 인접한 E 소유의 고양시 일산동구 F, G 양 지상 일반철골구조 경사지붕 제1종 근린생활시설(소매점) 제나동호 건물 177㎡가 전소하는 사고가 발생하였다
(f) H, who was employed as an employee of the lessee of the building of this case, owns his own on the date of the instant fire accident.