logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.10.12 2016가단8151
임대료
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiffs KRW 27,50,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 22, 2016 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. On January 22, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the lease deposit amounting to KRW 70,00,000,00, monthly rent of KRW 5,500,000, and the period from January 22, 2014 to November 21, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Defendant delivered the instant store to the Defendant with convenience points. The Defendant delayed the payment of rent to the Plaintiffs, and the fact that the rent of rent was caused by the lease deposit on June 24, 2015 (hereinafter “instant store”) may be acknowledged in full view of the following purport: (a) there is no dispute between the parties, or the testimony of the witness E.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs the amount of KRW 27,500,00 for five months from July 2015 to November 2015 from the termination of the instant lease agreement, and the damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from April 22, 2016 to the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order.

2. As to the defendants' assertion and judgment, the defendant requested the defendant to leave the store of this case on the grounds of the defendant's vehicle rent delay around March 2015, and the defendant knew that E and F should leave the store of this case around May 2015, and notified E and F of the fact of leaving the store of this case, and left the store of this case after informing E and E of the fact of eviction on June 2015. The defendant asserted that the lease contract of this case was terminated on June 6, 2015, and thus, there was no obligation to pay the next rent thereafter.

Witness

In full view of the purport of E’s testimony, E, which was delegated by the Plaintiffs to manage the instant store, urged the Defendant to pay the overdue rent, and around March 2015, if the overdue rent is continued on or around March 24, 2015.

arrow