logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2019.09.18 2017가단215836
소유권확인
Text

1. The Defendants confirm that the Plaintiff has ownership of the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the old land cadastre (Supplementary and card) of 63 square meters before the Gyeongsan-gun, Yangsan-gun, a unregistered land, F is indicated as the owner on May 6, 1912, but his address is expressed as a blank, and its land category is changed to a river on August 5, 1959.

B. The above land became the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) following the change of the name of the administrative district, the conversion of the area, etc.

C. G (G; hereinafter referred to as “the network”) as the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ subsidiaries were born from around 10, 1906, G (the name of the administrative district was changed to “Seoulsan-gun,” and “Seoul-gun,” but on April 25, 1938, G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died on February 18, 1990.

The mother of the plaintiff and the defendants died on May 17, 2006. D.

Pursuant to Article 24(4) of the Cadastral Act, the Plaintiff filed an application with the head of the Gun, the competent authority, for registration of the land owner’s address as “H” as the deceased’s former domicile, among the registered matters for land cadastre of the instant real estate, and the competent authority registered the owner’s address as “H” on August 4, 2008 on the computerized date of land cadastre of the instant real estate, following the investigation procedure as to whether the owner F recorded on the old land cadastre and the deceased, who is the Plaintiff’s father, are the same person.

E. The instant real estate was located outside the bank of the J, a local river, and was incorporated into the river area of the KJ on May 9, 2018, Busan Metropolitan City public notice of the said real estate.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 8 (including each number in case of additional number), Eul evidence Nos. 1, water resources management department of the Busan Metropolitan City Office of the Busan Metropolitan City, and each fact inquiry results against the head of the Busan Metropolitan City captain and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the original Plaintiff and the Defendants’ assertion.

arrow