beta
Text
1. 10/24 shares of 80 square meters in the area of 10/24 square meters in the area of 800 square meters in the area of Jeonnam-gun B, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the 7/24 shares in each of 7/24 shares
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The former land cadastre of the land as indicated in paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter “instant land”) is registered in the order of ownership transfer to G residing in F on January 30, 1940 (15 years after E was assessed on February 10, 1915), and to G residing in F on October 1, 1948 (15 years after fire 15 years). B. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, whose permanent domicile was located in the Y in the Y in the Y in the Y in the Y in the Y in the YY in the past, died on July 20, 1968. At the time of the death of the heir, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), who is the family register heir, and the designated parties, died on November 14, 1991. As to the shares of each of the instant land, the Plaintiff 10/24/27 of this case’s inheritance (the designated parties) and the designated parties of this case’s inheritance were deceased.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap 1-2 evidence (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. In full view of the aforementioned facts and the evidence admitted as above, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff, etc. who succeeded to J in succession is the same person as the Plaintiff, etc., registered as the owner on the old land cadastre and land cadastre of this case and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”). As such, the instant land is owned by the Plaintiff, etc. who succeeded to J in succession.
① The name of I registered as the owner of the instant land and the name of J, the Plaintiff, etc., are identical in the former land cadastre and the land cadastre of the instant land. The address and the permanent domicile of the Plaintiff, etc. are the same as “Seoul Y”.
② There is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff et al.’s father had a dynamic name in the Ha of the Jeonnam-gun at the time of his survival.
B. In addition, the claim for confirmation of land ownership against the State is unregistered and the land is not registered in the land cadastre or forest land cadastre, or the registrant is unknown, and the State owns a third party who is a titleholder of registration or enrollment.