logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.11.21 2018가단51531
공탁금 출급청구권 확인
Text

1. On June 19, 2015, the Defendant deposited 61,077,200 won with the U.S. District Court No. 2182 from the Ulsan District Court Decision No. 2182, Jun. 19, 2015, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Land assessment 1) The former land cadastre (No. 1-2 of the evidence No. 1-2) indicated “D” as the assessment titleholder of the 268 square meters of the road E on June 29, 1912, in the former land cadastre (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) and indicated “D” as the assessment titleholder of the 268 square meters of the road E on June 29, 1912. The said land became the 268 square meters of the road E in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun (hereinafter

(2) 2) The address of “D” is not indicated on the old land cadastre and land cadastre of the instant land, and the Defendant completed registration of preservation of ownership on the ground of land expropriation on June 26, 2015 and completed registration of preservation of ownership on the said land.

B. On August 6, 2012, the Defendant deposited KRW 61,07,20,00, the Ulsan District Court deposited KRW 61,077,20,00 (hereinafter “the instant deposit money”) with the Fund Park Park Project (G development project; hereinafter “this amendment announcement”) to expropriate the instant land for the instant project, designating the deposited person as “D”) on June 19, 2015, with the deposited person as “D” (hereinafter “the instant deposit money”).

3) The fact that the deposit account was deposited in the deposit account of this case is as follows: “The above land was unregistered, and the owner cannot be identified because only the owner’s name (D) was registered on the land cadastre, and the above compensation is deposited in the deposit account.” Article 40(2)2 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor is “The person entitled to the compensation without the fault of the project implementer cannot be identified.”

C. The legal domicile of the original copy of the Plaintiffs’ external conciliation division H and inheritance relationship 1) The permanent domicile of the original copy of the Plaintiff was “Seoul-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S. J.,” and died on September 16, 1937, as the Plaintiff’s external conciliation division, and three South Korea-K succeeded to H. Australia on the same day. 2) H was married with L and died on December 31, 1919, which was before H died.

H. H. H.

arrow