A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2017, 01:19 around 01:19, the Defendant: (a) the police box D belonging to the Seoul Jungp Police Station C commander of the Seoul Jungp Police Station, who received 112 reports and dispatched to the site, stated that “I return home to the Defendant for any danger at the time of delivery” was “I return home to the Defendant.”

Dora Dora Doz.

Doz. Doz. Doz., whether he or she is a superior, regardless of whether he or she can drink or enjoy alcoholic beverages

“Abruting” and obstructing a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties 112 when taking the face of the said D on drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Criminal video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is deemed that the crime of assaulting a police officer dispatched to the scene for the purpose of protecting the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution is minor;

shall not be deemed to exist.

The defendant has been punished for a crime related to violence on several occasions.

However, it is against the view of committing the crime of this case.

All circumstances, such as the age, conduct of sex, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., in a contingent manner, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account such circumstances, the defendant's age, motive of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.