Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 29, 2017, at the central market bus stop located in the Dong-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, the Defendant boarded the bus at 616 times in the city bus stop, and then avoided the disturbance, such as paying time fees to bus officers and other passengers. Upon receiving 112 reports from the bus stop in the Central Dong-dong community service center located in the same Dong-dong, the Defendant sent the bus D (27 years) to the police officer belonging to the Daejeon Dong-dong Police Station C District (27 years).
Defendant D’s complaint that he was released from a bus on the ground that she would have caused damage to other passengers. The above D’s defect, “as it might be dangerous on the road,” the Defendant’s defect, i.e., “N., on the road”, she would grow up as the test attached by N.N. on the road.
”라고 하면서 D에게 달려들어 멱살을 잡고 수회 밀치고, D으로부터 공무집행 방해죄로 체포될 수 있음을 경고 받았음에도 “ 손주 뻘도 안 되는 놈이 왜 나한 테 이래라
Dr. Doz. Doz.
“A police officer’s legitimate execution of duties on the handling of 112 Reports was obstructed by assaulting D’s left chests at 2-3 times by drinking.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act stated to the effect that the defendant denies the crime by the investigative agency, but this court recognizes the crime and reflects it in this court, the fact that the victimized police officer was killed, the fact that the victimized police officer did not commit the same crime, the degree of exercising force, etc.