The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months and confiscation) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant divided the crime of this case and reflected against the defendant, and the degree of damage is not significant.

However, the Defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment several times due to the same crime, and even after having been sentenced to criminal punishment for the same crime, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes within the period of repeated crime, and even if having completed the sentence, it cannot be considered that the Defendant is likely to commit a similar crime in light of the criminal behavior as planned.

In full view of the above circumstances and circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.