The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant repents in depth and reflects the crime of this case.

However, even though the Defendant had already been sentenced to multiple punishments for the same kind of crime and completed the sentence, the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly and repeatedly within the short period after release, and it is not good to purchase goods using a stolen-friendly card. The previous criminal records and each of the instant crimes are similar to the manual, thereby likely to constitute a similar crime.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., even if considering all the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.