The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is a favorable condition to the defendant for the following reasons: (a) the defendant has a depth and reflects the crime of this case; and (b) the degree of damage is not significant.

However, the Defendant is not only subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, but also under criminal punishment for the same crime even after having been sentenced to punishment for the same crime, and even after having completed the sentence, the Defendant committed the instant crime within the short term after being released from the prison, and most of the crimes under similar Acts and subordinate statutes, which could lead to the possibility of the Defendant to commit a similar crime again.

In full view of the above circumstances and circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is excessively unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.