1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance, which the plaintiff appealed in the court of first instance asserted in the court of first instance, are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed legitimate even if the plaintiff neglected the entries in the evidence No. 20 to No. 25 submitted

Therefore, the reasoning of this court's judgment is that "Witness R, S, T, X" is "R, S, T, and X of the first instance court", "the result of the on-site inspection of this court" is "the result of the on-site inspection of the court of the first instance", "196" of the 6th judgment of the first instance as "196", and it is identical to the ground of the first instance court's judgment, except for the addition of the following, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

-Form 6 of the first instance judgment, accompanied by the following:

⑤ On March 22, 1980, N Forest land was divided into N and this case’s land upon the Defendant’s application for subdivision on March 2, 1980, and the Defendant appears to have completed registration of preservation of ownership on the instant land divided with the intent to own on February 18, 1981.

However, the Plaintiff argued that the instant land was not owned by the Defendant for the first time since the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership on February 18, 1981 and around May 2006, and that the divided N until then was unregistered.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.