logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.22 2013노771
상해등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the consistent statement of the victim that the victim was injured by the summary of the grounds for appeal (not guilty part), the victim received medical treatment at the hospital immediately after the instant case, and the police officer in charge of the initial investigation also confirmed the victim's injury, etc., the victim's injury was sufficiently recognized, and the defendant could avoid danger by means of prior attack such as avoiding the victim's position, and the victim's prior attack did not constitute an act that does not go against self-defense or social rules. Thus, the court below acquitted the defendant, even though the defendant did not constitute an act that does not go against self-defense or social rules, there was an error of law by misunderstanding the facts or by misapprehending legal principles.

2. Around 14:00 on August 5, 201, the Defendant, at the office located in the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-gu G, Gyeonggi-do office, “H Real Estate,” sent the money lent by the victim I to return the money, and at the office, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., the victim’s crypted the eggs of the victim, frightened the victim’s neck, frightened on two occasions due to drinking, and frightened on two occasions due to the victim’s crypted on the land, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the verte’s dye, bones, tension, etc., which requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

3. The judgment of the court below stated that I stated that "I, at the location of the defendant's office, she welshes the defendant's desire, she broken down the defendant's desire, cut down the defendant's humping, or attempted to do so, but the defendant was not able to do so," and J, an employee of the defendant's office, stated that "I, at the point of view of the defendant's office, she told the defendant to report to the police," and I stated that "I, at the time of the defendant's office, she tolds the defendant to return to the police," and that "I told the defendant to report to the police."

arrow