logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.31 2013고정1528
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on May 30, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 13, 2013.

The defendant is a person of distinguished service to the State (Grade VII).

On January 21, 2013, at around 17:43, the Defendant demanded KRW 20,000 to the injured party B, who was in the Gwangju District, in order to go to Seoul in front of the waiting rooms in the Gwangju Northern District located in 235, the Defendant: (a) stated that “self-reliance is a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, and may purchase boarding passes at a half price.”

Afterwards, the Defendant purchased 50% at a discount of 18,400 won for the 20,000 won for the victim's 20,000 won in the ticket counter of Gwangju Station, using his certificate of merit (C) for the 614 KTX train Gwangju-Umsan Station (ordinary freight of 36,800 won) for the 614,00 won for the 18,400 won for the 16,000 won for the 16,000 won for the 16,000 won for the 16,000 won for the mar

Despite the knowledge that the train tickets purchased using the certificate of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State cannot be used by any other person than the person who possessed the certificate of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, the Defendant acquired the total amount of 912,00 won and 40,300 won from the government budget by way of sending back to the victims who are not aware of such fact after purchasing the tickets using the certificate of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State 33 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes, including the above criminal facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement with respect to B and D and written E;

1. Suspect photographs, the details of the right to request construction of the railroad, and investigation reports (folating the video recording data at the folish site,CCTV);

1. Previous convictions: the defendant's legal statement and application of the Daejeon District Court Decision Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow