beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Seoul East East District Court on February 6, 2013, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 14, 2013.
1. On December 2012, the Defendant found one driver’s license, which was owned by the victim B, in front of the entrance of the subway station 3 times in the subway station, at the time of light lighting around the end of December, 2012.
The Defendant, without taking necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, embezzled the property he/she had on his/her own mind.
2. Illegal uttering of official documents;
A. At around 18:30 on January 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) presented the instant B’s driver’s license, which is an official document that was obtained and held as in the foregoing “1” to verify the identity in opening the gallon 2 mobile phone in the said B’s name; and (b) exercised the said B’s driver’s license by presenting it to an employee who could not know the name of the said official document. (c) On January 3, 2013, the Defendant, around 18:40 on January 3, 2013, presented the Gaphone 5’s mobile phone to an official document, which was obtained and held as in the said “1” to verify the identity in opening the Gaphone 5’s mobile phone in the said B’s name.
3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. At around 18:30 on January 2, 2013, the Defendant entered “B”, “G”, “G”, “G”, “B”, “G”, “G”, and “B”, and “B”, respectively, in the passenger name column of payment of charges in the name of the customer who pays automatic transfer, on the same page, signed the signature of “B” in the signature column, and then issued the signature of “B” to “B”, “G”, and “B” on the signature column. In order to open the mobile phone under the above B’s name, the Defendant signed the forged application to “B”, an employee who is aware of the forgery.
Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to exercise his authority.