Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of suspension of execution for the crime of destroying the present building and fire, and on May 19, 2012, the Defendant was in a state of lacking the ability to discern things or make decisions due to intellectual disability, depression, etc.

1. On October 11, 201, the Defendant forged a private document and display of a falsified document at the “D” mobile phone agency located in Doang-si, J. C around October 11, 201, entered E’s resident registration number and address in the resident registration number column and address column, and then forged an application form for mobile phone subscription in the name of E, which is a private document on the rights and duties of the subscriber’s name, for the purpose of exercising the signature of E after stating E’s name in the subscriber’s name column, and submitted it as if the application form for forgery was duly completed to the above mobile phone agency employee who is aware of the fact.

2. On February 14, 2012, around February 14, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents and uttering of the aforementioned investigation documents: (a) at the “G mobile phone agency located in the Namyang-si, the Defendant entered E’s resident registration number and address in the resident registration number column and address column of the SK Telecom New Service contract; (b) written E’s name in the subscriber’s name column; and (c) written E’s name in the customer name column; and (d) written E’s new service contract, the terminal installment contract, the LTP license agreement, and the LTP license agreement with the private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising his/her signature; and (b) submitted the mobile phone agency’s application to enter the forged terminal, the installment contract, and the LETP license agreement to enter into the new service contract to enter the mobile phone agency as described above to be genuinely formed with the aforementioned mobile phone agency’s employee without knowledge of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A new contract for a service;