logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.03.21 2018나4133
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiffs sought reimbursement of the deceased A’s medical expenses, nursing expenses, and consolation money from the Defendant. The first instance court dismissed the claim for medical expenses and nursing expenses, respectively, and partly accepted the claim for consolation money (total KRW 10 million).

Accordingly, the plaintiffs appealed only to the claim of consolation money of KRW 20 million in the part against the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed to the claim of consolation money, which is subject to the judgment of this court, is limited to the claim of consolation money.

2. The court's explanation about this case is as follows: (a) whether to compensate for all damages under Section 16 of the 8th judgment of the first instance; (b) whether to compensate for all damages under Section 16 of the 16th judgment "(2)"; (c) "all damages" under Section 4 and 5 of the 9th judgment as "defensive materials"; and (d) "in accordance with the infringement on the deceased's right to self-determination" under Section 7 of the 9th judgment as "infensives against the deceased's right to self-determination"; and (c) except for adding the judgment of Section 3 as to the argument that the defendant emphasizes or added, it is identical to the

3. As of December 16, 2015, the Defendant claimed that, as of December 16, 2015, as of the scheduled date of the operation for the Deceased, the kidy value of the Deceased was high, the Defendant would perform the operation when the kidy value of the Deceased is improved by a doctor, internal medicine, and anesthesia, and explained such contents to the Deceased and his guardian, and performed the operation on December 21, 2015.

However, according to the evidence submitted by the Defendant, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital, on December 16, 2015, appeared to be high in the value of the deceased’s extension, and determined that there is a possibility of closing the expansion due to changes in the amount of body and low blood pressure during the operation through the cooperation between the internal department, internal department, and anesthesia and medical specialists, and explained it to the deceased and their guardians.

arrow