1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to replacing part of the judgment of the court of first instance to "amount of claim by plaintiff in attached Form 3" attached to the judgment of the court of first instance and to "amount of claim by transferee in attached Form 3."

<고치는 부분> ◎ 제3쪽 제일 마지막 행부터 제4쪽 제6행까지 제1의

A. Paragraph 2) of the part of Paragraph 2 of the same Article “2” is a person who has been subcontracted part of the instant construction work, and Plaintiff I and the co-Plaintiffs of the first instance court were supplied with meals, goods, etc. to IM comprehensive construction at the construction site of this case. The Plaintiffs and the co-Plaintiffs of the first instance court concluded a contract to receive KRW 196,537,750 in total from IM comprehensive construction as indicated in the acquisition amount by transferee of attached Table 3 among the construction cost claims against the Defendant of IM comprehensive construction and the first instance court, and IM comprehensive construction was sent to the Defendant on April 15, 2013. The above notice of assignment of assignment was sent to the Defendant on April 15, 2013.

“ ◎ 제4쪽 제9행 “별지3 원고별 청구금액란 기재 채권”을 “별지3 양수인별 양수금액란 기재 각 해당 채권”으로 고친다. ◎ 제6쪽 제14행 “원고 J”을 “제1심 공동원고 J"으로 고친다.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by all of the plaintiffs' appeals.