All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The reasons why the court used in this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the corresponding part as follows, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 4th part of the first instance judgment “Plaintiffs” in the 9th part of the 4th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19 part of the 19th part of the 19 part of the

Part VII through 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added as follows.

【B) On April 9, 2015, the Intervenor invited the major personnel and residents of the X Center located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015 to explain the construction plan for transformation facilities, etc., and 30 residents present.

Although the plaintiffs asserted that the above explanation and hearing procedure was formal, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the facts of alleged assertion only with the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 9 and 10, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted.

C) On November 17, 2015, the Yanananan City publicly announced the inspection of residents and the holding of briefing sessions on the instant implementation plan. The aforementioned public announcement was written in detail, including the outline of electric source facilities, the location and size of the electric source development business area, the implementation period, and the fact that the resident briefing sessions were held at the conference room of the Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, 2015, Nov. 24, 2015, and that the implementation plan of this case can be perused by the office of the Seoan-gu Office (Industrial Economy and Regional Economic Team) and the office of the conflict management department of the mid-gu, 2015. The said public announcement was enforced until December 4, 2015 (as alleged by the plaintiffs, the said public announcement was published only in the Official Gazette and the local daily newspapers, but only on such circumstances alone.